Love, Friendship, & Third Places
Ray & I are quoted in Bloomberg CityLab; I present selections from Francis Bacon's "Of Friendship"
I love the fact that in 2021 any article about social life and third places starts by referring to Ray Oldenburg’s The Great Good Place. Ray turned 89 on Wednesday and says his memory is shot but we’ve still managed a couple of Zoom happy hours, thanks to his pal Robert Dugan, a librarian turned senior administrator at his university. He’s handed over the second edition of his famous book to a co-author—yours truly—and we’re quoted in Bloomberg CityLab this week.
That article is about non-intimate conversations, but what’s really been on my mind this week is the more intimate things we don’t talk about on Twitter or Facebook or Zoom: our doubts, regrets, longings, fears, and failures. I think back to conversations with close friends and realize that I’ve lost touch with what’s really going on with them because we haven’t been able to sit over a pot of tea or in a hotel lounge with a martini in hand, or taking a long walk in Hyde Park.
I’ve had it with Mark Zuckerberg and the Facebook business model, but many wonderful people, some of whom I consider real friends, use Facebook a lot. Should I force myself to spend time there in order to stay in touch till we can meet again?
I thought Michel de Montaigne, the French essayist, might have some advice so I turned to his “On Friendship.” Since I have a set of the Harvard Classics, I also pulled out “Of Friendship” by the English philosopher and statesman Francis Bacon.
It’s Bacon I want to share today because his three points about friendship are so relevant and so orderly. I wasn’t surprised to learn that he developed a system for cataloging books and has been called the father of the scientific method. His methodical approach is helpful when one is trying to dissect an older text!
You can read the whole essay here. But it took me two passes to pull out the most interesting details so I have no qualms about offering the highlights. His introduction contains a sentence that is particularly apt:
A crowd is not company; and faces are but a gallery of pictures; and talk but a tinkling cymbal, where there is no love.
And he mentions a concept that certainly resonates after more than a year of Zoom meetings, the “lonely crowd”:
Magna civitas, magna solitudo; because in a great town friends are scattered; so that there is not that fellowship, for the most part, which is in less neighborhoods.
True friendship, he says, has depth and relies on perfect trust:
No[thing…] openeth the heart, but a true friend; to whom you may impart griefs, joys, fears, hopes, suspicions, counsels, and whatsoever lieth upon the heart to oppress it, in a kind of civil…confession.
Friendship is essential to everyone. Even “princes that had wives, sons, nephews; and yet all these could not supply the comfort of friendship.” He refers to a person’s being able to confide “those secrets which troubled him most.”
This first fruit of friendship, says Bacon, “redoubleth joys, and cutteth griefs in halves.”
The second fruit of friendship is that it “maketh daylight in the understanding.” He says that we become wiser “more by an hour's discourse [with a friend], than by a day's meditation.”
Bacon spends a lot of time in the essay talking about just why we need friends to put us on the right track.
The light that a man receiveth by counsel from another, is drier and purer, than that which cometh from his own understanding and judgment.
He says that those in positions of power especially need to be corrected and counseled, basically because they start to believe their own press and need to be brought back to reality.
It is a strange thing to behold, what gross errors and extreme absurdities many (especially of the greater sort) do commit, for want of a friend to tell them of them; to the great damage both of their fame and fortune: for, as St. James saith, they are as men that look sometimes into a glass, and presently forget their own shape and favor.
He’s no fan of “crowd wisdom,” either, and wouldn’t think much of people who turn to Twitter every time they have a question. He argues that true friends know the whole of us, and like a doctor think of the whole person when offering advice.
Therefore rest not upon scattered counsels; they will rather distract and mislead, than settle and direct.
The third and last fruit of friendship “is like the pomegranate, full of many kernels; I mean aid, and bearing a part.”
This is where the rubber meets the road. A true friend will step up to help, and sometimes represent us. The following sentence seems very contemporary, don’t you think?
A man cannot speak to his son but as a father; to his wife but as a husband; to his enemy but upon terms: whereas a friend may speak as the case requires.
Browsing for more on the subject, I found the Oxford Book of Friendship, which I was sent as a review copy long ago and had never opened. It is remarkably interesting, full of all kinds of tidbits. I just happened on this:
In Mali, best friends throw excrement at each other and comment loudly on the genitals of their respective parents – this to us unnatural and obscene behavior is a proof of the love of friends. —Robert Brain, Friends and Lovers, 1976
And how about this, from the editors?
A recurrent complaint has it that whereas male friends are content to take you as you are, women usually want to change and improve you.
Yuval Noah Harari’s 21 Lessons for the 21st Century has a chapter called “Community: Humans Have Bodies” that’s ostensibly about community, because that’s what Facebook claims it cares about, but that is just as much about the dynamics of friendship and intimacy.
Even the Cinderella story has been used, by the writer Rebecca Solnit, to teach a very contemporary lesson about relationships. She posits that the prince and Cinderella were just lonely young people, isolated in their different ways, and that instead of a romance they found happiness—and their true selves—in becoming friends, not lovers. This seems to miss the point of a nearly universal fairytale plot, but perhaps today the longing for a true friend is as powerful as the traditional longing to be turned into a princess.
Here’s something to be happy about: the vaccine clinic at the school that at last has a sign outside reading “W. E. B. Du Bois Middle School.” Read more.
Next week is the annual conference of the Organization of American Historians and the “Three Loves of Lewis Mumford” panel we recorded will be available before the live discussion session next Saturday. We’re able to invite a few guests to join the session so if you’re interested in Mumford or women’s history, or marital infidelity, drop me a line.
*More about Terry Jones here.
Hi Karen, Thanks for the good writing and even better, for the informed thinking. As a long time newspaper reporter, I appreciate both. I'm trying to make history and science subjects that excite our YA citizens. Check my website: joyhakim.com. I'm now writing biology books that approach that subject though narrative. Of course I have a chapter about Francis Bacon.
Writing learning books for the YA market is not for the faint of heart. Our schools have been owned by a few megapublishers. Think robber barons and you'll begin to understand.
Here's a letter from a reader in Maine:
From: Meagan Packard mepackard79@yahoo.com Subject: Thank You! from loyal reader
Date: January 23, 2019 at 9:32 PM To: joyhakim@gmail.com
Dear Joy,
Thank you for your books ! I haven't read all of them
but I'm into my fourth :)
My name is Meagan, 39 yrs young and mother of two boys
now 14 and 8. I live near Augusta Maine and I was compelled
to write you a thank you note.
I first discovered your book "The history of Science,
with Newton at the center" back in September 2018 when it was
featured on one of the front facing shelves in the children's
room of Lithgow Library in Augusta. I was hooked and even
brought it to work to read on my short breaks. I am an
electrician at Bath Iron Works. I want you to know that you
have re-ignited my passion for history. Now that I have
completed college and settled into a career, and brought my
children to semi-self efficient state, I have more time to
read !!! Yeah !! And it has been your books that have a
real page turner for me. I love your style; informative,
personal, matter of fact and just over-all lovely.
I am a minority in my field, and especially a minority
in the male dominated world of ship building. I found it
completely striking and uplifting to read in "the Story of
Science, Newton at the Center" the compelling and integral
role women had in science. I even read aloud to the men I
sit with at break a portion of that book (in-fact I have read
many portions since then to them, and even some at their
request ... and just having your book in front of me, I got the
affectionate nick name "Copernistein") ... It read something to
the effect -- Her parents were frustrated with her and warned
and pleaded that a man would never want to marry a woman so
well read. The entire text continually made me appreciate
the time I live in and the opportunities given to me by our
historic heroes :) So, I thank you again for taking the time
and having the foresight to write your books. Kudos !
I only learned today upon attempting to contact you that
you are 88 years young! Wow ! I never suspected that the
writer so in tune with the needs of this generation ... the x-
generation of my children ... was well .. I'm sorry ... In her
Eighties :) I mean no disrespect, believe me, I am proud of
you that you write to such a broad audience in such a way
that connects us all to our past. Thank you !
I have also read "the Age of Extremes" and loved it,
great job. And most of "Story of Science, Einstein's new
Dimension" but now I am in delved in the "First Americans"
and I love how you keep the theme of a flying time machine
throughout.
You have captured me and my children and my colleges into
your way of viewing our history and retelling it in a very
personal, pleasing, and provocative narrative. I have
praised your books at our library and have encouraged them to
keep your books at the front facing shelves !
Thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
Meagan E.
Algorithms for social media platforms like Facebook almost universally discourage disinterested discussion and reward emotional responses as a technique for keeping customers at the site for as long as possible, thereby being exposed to advertisers who mostly fund Facebook. The extreme emotional responses that conspiracy theories can evoke send many customers down rabbit holes of increasingly paranoia such as Q-Anon hype. Furthermore, Facebook and other social media sites have shown by their actions that they have not respected customers' privacy concerns and allowed access to predatory third parties such as Cambridge Analytica. For such reasons, I have never opened any social account such as Facebook, and never intend to, though I can understand why some fellow skeptics of social media corporations have opened such an account as a condition of employment. I am pleased that my employer, a public university, has not required that I open a social media account as a condition of employment--that would arguably be a violation of academic freedom. Social media corporations, like the largest interest service provider corporations, ought to be subject to anti-trust laws, which have increasingly been ignored by lax government regulators in recent decades.